Your internet browser isn't supported.

For security reasons, we no longer support Internet Explorer. Please upgrade to an alternate browser to see all functionality and content on the website.

What Legendary Athletes Taught Us About Sports Lighting

What Legendary Athletes Taught Us About Sports Lighting

When four professional athletes independently arrive at the same conclusion, it's worth paying attention.

Reggie Jackson. Jim McMahon. Arthur Moats. Andrea Seppi. A Hall of Fame outfielder, a Super Bowl champion, a professional linebacker, and a professional tennis player —different sports, different careers, one consistent message: lighting matters more than most people realize.

Cooper Lighting Solutions recently sat down with them to talk about what they've experienced firsthand. What emerged was a clear picture of what's at stake when sports facilities get lighting wrong.

Coverage gaps are a performance problem.

Jim McMahon put it plainly. In his playing days, the technology didn't exist to ensure every inch of the field was properly lit. Dead zones, hot spots, and uneven coverage aren't just visual nuisances. They create real disadvantages for players who depend on consistent sight lines to perform.

Modern sports lighting systems eliminate those gaps. Uniform illumination across the full playing surface means every player, in every position, is working with the same visual information.


Reaction time depends on what athletes can see.

Reggie Jackson's point is one that physics supports: you cannot react to what you cannot clearly see. For a hitter reading a pitch, a receiver tracking a pass, or a tennis player reading a serve, the milliseconds it takes to process visual information are the difference between a great play and a missed one.

Poor lighting doesn't just make things harder to see — it slows everything down. Upgraded lighting with high uniformity ratios and optimized color rendering gives athletes the visual clarity they need to perform at their highest level.


Inconsistency across venues creates compounding disadvantages.

Arthur Moats raised something facility operators often overlook: athletes who compete across multiple venues deal with wildly inconsistent lighting conditions. Adapting to a new facility's lighting environment mid-game is a real cognitive load, and it shows up in performance. 

For facility owners and operators, this is a competitive differentiator. A venue with consistent, high-quality lighting is one where athletes perform better — and one they want to come back to.


The injury risk is real and measurable.

Andrea Seppi's point connects directly to the data. Studies show that improved lighting conditions can reduce athlete injury risk by up to 20%. For a tennis player tracking a ball moving at speed, or a football player making cuts in low-visibility conditions, that number represents real people avoiding real injuries.

For facility owners, the math extends beyond performance. Fewer injuries mean lower liability exposure, better athlete retention, and a safer environment for everyone on the premises.


What this means for your facility.

The athletes obviously aren't lighting experts. They're people who have spent careers depending on their environments to perform. Their observations are unscripted and firsthand — and they point to a consistent standard that every sports facility should be working toward.

At Cooper Lighting Solutions, we design sports lighting systems that meet that standard. Whether you're managing a community recreation center, a collegiate athletic facility, or a professional venue, the goal is the same: give every athlete the best possible environment to compete.

Book time today with a sports lighting expert to move your project forward.